Skip to content

Only? (Only.)

April 23, 2012

January 17th, 2012 9:30am

Is this so?

(No, it cannot be. No, it must not be.)

19.

nineteen.

nineteen?

19.

Only?

Only.

But what if 19 were not 19, but were 89 instead?

(Then it could be. Then, it must be.)

Eighty-nine, yes, 89.

So 19 is 89, good – good.

Then I could be. Finally, I could be.

But 19 is 19.

nineteen,

nineteen.

Only?

Only.

So 19, I am.

But 19 not be me.

Advertisements
No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: